<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>CalibratedAgents blog</title><link>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/</link><description>Research, benchmarks and essays on AI hallucination detection and AI answer verification.</description><language>en</language><item><title>Microsoft-Decision-1 vs OpenAI vs Jev vs Cloudflare Clef: decision models benchmarked (2026)</title><link>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/microsoft-decision-1-benchmark</link><guid>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/microsoft-decision-1-benchmark</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Microsoft launched Microsoft-Decision-1 on 9 October 2026. The next day, we put it through the same test as the other leading decision APIs: one judge call per answer, on the same LLM-AggreFact answers, measured for speed, accuracy and cost. No single provider wins everywhere.</description></item><item><title>Hallucination detection in 2026: find the wrong sentence, not just the wrong answer</title><link>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/hallucination-detection</link><guid>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/hallucination-detection</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>An AI answer is rarely all wrong. Usually one or two sentences are, and an answer-level hallucination detection check can&#x27;t tell you which. We measured that gap on 5,916 human-labelled sentences from two public benchmarks, and how far checking each sentence closes it.</description></item><item><title>Hallucination detection benchmark 2026: 50 labelled answers beat a tuned LLM judge</title><link>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/hallucination-detection-benchmark</link><guid>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/hallucination-detection-benchmark</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Most hallucination detection benchmarks compare detectors with whatever thresholds their authors chose. Teams don&#x27;t work that way: they label a handful of their own answers and tune on those. So that is the test we ran, on RAGTruth++ and LLM-AggreFact, with the same labels for every system.</description></item><item><title>Why LLM-as-a-judge fails in production: the base rate problem</title><link>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/why-not-an-llm-judge</link><guid>https://calibratedagents.com/blog/why-not-an-llm-judge</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>LLM-as-a-judge has good recall and no precision control. In production, where most answers are correct, that turns into a flood of false positives. Here is the arithmetic, and what a calibrated verifier returns instead.</description></item></channel></rss>